Review




Structured Review

DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS microarray‐based dna methylation profiling
Microarray‐Based Dna Methylation Profiling, supplied by DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray‐based dna methylation profiling/product/DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray‐based dna methylation profiling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images



Similar Products

90
DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS microarray‐based dna methylation profiling
Microarray‐Based Dna Methylation Profiling, supplied by DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray‐based dna methylation profiling/product/DIAGENODE DIAGNOSTICS
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray‐based dna methylation profiling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k
DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of <t>DNA</t> from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains <t>of</t> <t>methylation,</t> with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.
Microarray Based Dna Methylation Profiling Illumina 27k, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray-based dna methylation profiling illumina 27k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc microarray-based dna methylation profiling
DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of <t>DNA</t> from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains <t>of</t> <t>methylation,</t> with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.
Microarray Based Dna Methylation Profiling, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray-based dna methylation profiling/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray-based dna methylation profiling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc universal beadarrays microarray-based dna methylation profiling
DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of <t>DNA</t> from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains <t>of</t> <t>methylation,</t> with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.
Universal Beadarrays Microarray Based Dna Methylation Profiling, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/universal beadarrays microarray-based dna methylation profiling/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
universal beadarrays microarray-based dna methylation profiling - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of DNA from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains of methylation, with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.

Journal: Progress in brain research

Article Title: Genetic and epigenetic pathways in Down syndrome: insights to the brain and immune system from humans and mouse models

doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.09.002

Figure Lengend Snippet: DS-DM in human DS and the Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey mouse models, assessed by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of DNA from brain tissue (cerebral cortex). Differentially methylated region (DMR) detection reveals similarities and differences between two DS mouse models [Ts65Dn and Dp(16)1Yey], and between each model and human DS. DMRs were defined using the DEFIANT algorithm (Condon et al. 2018). Gains of methylation, with very few losses, are seen in the PCDHA-PCDHG protocadherin gene clusters, both in human DS and in the two mouse models. However, the patterns differ. Euploid age-matched controls were sequenced for the human data, and wild-type littermates were the controls for the mouse data. The delta methyl tracks indicate all statistically significant DMRs comparing DS vs control and mutant vs WT mouse brains; all adequately covered CpGs (>20X) are indicated in the bottom tracks. The linear scale for differences in fractional methylation is from −0.4 to +0.4, with the greatest differential methylation in this chromosomal region being +0.4.

Article Snippet: In our initial work, microarray-based DNA methylation profiling (Illumina 27K) in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) from individuals with DS and age-matched controls revealed gains and losses of DNA methylation, strongly affecting ~100 genes, as a consistent epigenetic response to Ts21 in these cells ( Kerkel et al. 2010 ).

Techniques: Methylation Sequencing, Methylation, Mutagenesis